Every article on this site is written by AI from official sources and checked by a second AI. How it works
Proposed rule

Improving Transparency Into Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fee Disclosure

Built by the Tribune's code from the Federal Register. No AI wrote this page. Published in the Federal Register Jan. 30, 2026. Document 2026-01907. Updated Nov. 15, 2026.

What it does

The Department is proposing a regulation that would require providers of pharmacy benefit management services and affiliated providers of brokerage and consulting services to disclose information about their compensation to fiduciaries of self-insured group health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). These disclosures are needed so that fiduciaries can assess the reasonableness of the contracts or arrangements with these service providers, including the reasonableness of the service providers' compensation. These disclosure requirements would apply for purposes of ERISA's statutory prohibited transaction exemption for services arrangements. This proposal implements section 12 of President Trump's Executive Order 14273, Lowering Drug Prices by Once Again Putting Americans First, which instructs the Department to propose regulations to improve employer health plan transparency into the direct and indirect compensation received by pharmacy benefit managers. If finalized, this regulation would affect sponsors and other fiduciaries of self-insured group health plans and certain service providers to such plans.

The Employee Benefits Security Administration's summary, as published in the Federal Register.

What it would change

1 part of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations:

29 CFR 2550

What happens next and when

Comments are due on or before March 31, 2026.

The agency's dates, word for word.

Document number2026-01907
ActionProposed rule.
AgenciesLabor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration
PublishedJan. 30, 2026
Comments closeMarch 31, 2026
Regulation identifier (RIN)1210-AB37
DocketEBSA-2026-0001
Significant (marked in the Federal Register)Yes

Source: the Federal Register (public domain). The document in the Federal Register