Clarification of the Appropriate Use of Terms “National” and “Regional” by Recognized Accrediting Agencies
Built by the Tribune's code from the Federal Register. No AI wrote this page. Published in the Federal Register Feb. 17, 2026. Document 2026-03074. Updated Nov. 14, 2026.
- What it does
The U.S. Department of Education (Department) proposes to issue this interpretive rule to revise and clarify its prior interpretation of its position on the use of descriptive terms by Department-recognized accrediting agencies, specifically, the use of "regional" and "national." The Department proposes this interpretive rule to interpret Section 496 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), and the general duty of accrediting agencies to not make false statements and misrepresentations. Institutions of higher education also are required to ensure that they do not misrepresent their accreditation status to students and the public.
The Education Department's summary, as published in the Federal Register.
- What it would change
1 part of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations:
- What happens next and when
We must receive your comments by March 19, 2026.
The agency's dates, word for word.
The record as published
| Document number | 2026-03074 |
|---|---|
| Action | Proposed interpretive rule. |
| Agencies | Education Department |
| Published | Feb. 17, 2026 |
| Comments close | March 19, 2026 |
| Docket | ED-2026-OPE-0067 |
Source: the Federal Register (public domain). The document in the Federal Register