Every article on this site is written by AI from official sources and checked by a second AI. How it works
Proposed rule

Enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider Requirements and Strengthening STIR/SHAKEN (Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Advanced Methods To Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls)

Built by the Tribune's code from the Federal Register. No AI wrote this page. Published in the Federal Register July 9, 2026. Document 2026-13874. Updated Nov. 8, 2026.

What it does

In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) proposes steps to strengthen its robocall mitigation framework by enhancing Know-Your-Upstream-Provider (KYUP) requirements, improving oversight of voice service providers by the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority, raising caller ID attestation standards, and closing implementation gaps in STIR/SHAKEN implementation. Specifically, the Commission proposes establishing baseline KYUP information-collection, compliance review, verification, monitoring, and responsive-action requirements to ensure providers can identify and cut off bad-actor upstream providers. The Commission also proposes measures to expand the Governance Authority's vetting, enforcement, and reporting responsibilities to prevent misuse of STIR/SHAKEN certificates and to remove noncompliant providers from the authentication ecosystem. The Commission further proposes clarifying and strengthening STIR/SHAKEN attestation rules, including codifying attestation levels, defining improper attestations, and specifying permissible mechanisms for verifying number-to-customer associations. Additionally, the Commission proposes and seeks comment on additional steps to close caller ID authentication gaps, such as refining provider definitions, reconsidering exemptions, requiring providers serving end users to assign STIR/SHAKEN attestations, and ensuring calls maintain authentication information. The Commission also seeks comment on special circumstances, including addressing issues with foreign- originated calls.

The Federal Communications Commission's summary, as published in the Federal Register.

What it would change

2 parts of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations:

47 CFR 1, 47 CFR 64

What happens next and when

Comments are due on or before August 10, 2026 and reply comments are due on or before September 8, 2026.

The agency's dates, word for word.

Document number2026-13874
ActionProposed rule.
AgenciesFederal Communications Commission
PublishedJuly 9, 2026
Comments closeAug. 10, 2026

Source: the Federal Register (public domain). The document in the Federal Register